Finding the Unknown Mass
Ally and I solved to find the mass of a variable on top of a cart. The variable we found was the weight of the soup can.
First, we weighed the mass of the cart: .49 kg. We put the center of the cart at 110 inches and the markers on the side at 53 inches and 173 inches.
After taking 5 trials of the empty cart, the average velocity taken was .5 m/s. We then put the soup on the cart and measured the velocity. After taking 5 more separate trials, we found the average velocity with the soup can to be .25 m/s.
Then our group needed to solve for the mass of the cart with the soup can. We used the formula mava + mbvb = (ma + mb) (Vab).
mava + mbvb = (ma + mb) (Vab)
.49 (.5) +0 = (.49 + mb) .25
.245 = .1225 + .25mb
.1225 = .25mb
.49 kg = mb
To check our percent error, our group measured the cart with the soup can on it: 478 grams and converted it to kg: 0.478 kg
Therefore our percent error= 2.51%
To calculate the percent error:
=(.478)(.49)/ .478*100
= 2.51%
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Video Blog Analysis
Nikki Montlick
Video Blog Analysis
The video to the right is the video my group used to collect the majority of our data for this lab. The yellow line against the blue wall represents a meter within the context of the video. My group uploaded our video to capstone and identified the points of motion the ball in the air. The proceeding image is the points of motion for the ball along the arc. The balls movement is forward and up.
Next, using capstone, my group created position versus time graphs and velocity versus time graphs and position versus time graphs in both the x and y for the motion of the ball.
3. Analysis:
Fg is the only force in the vertical direction. The greatest possible acceleration is -10m/s^2. When I highlighted my points on my graph my acceleration was within a a tenth of 10m/s^2. The FBD is the same as a. because the same object is being thrown. The Fnet=0 because there is no force in the horizontal. Therefore the acceleration is equal to 0m/s^2.
c
c. The initial velocity in the x direction is 0.6m/s. I know because I looked on the vty graph and on the equation of the line, b is always the initial velocity. I can identify the initial velocity in the x and y direction by looking at the equation on the graph. The equation is y=mx+b, and I know that b is equal to the initial velocity, then the initial velocity based off my equation of the graph is 0.6m/s. The initial velocity is .3m/s. I know this because on the velocity versus time graph in the y direction, the b in the equation of the line is .3m/s.The velocity at the top of its x path is .6m/s.
c. The initial velocity in the x direction is 0.6m/s. I know because I looked on the vty graph and on the equation of the line, b is always the initial velocity. I can identify the initial velocity in the x and y direction by looking at the equation on the graph. The equation is y=mx+b, and I know that b is equal to the initial velocity, then the initial velocity based off my equation of the graph is 0.6m/s. The initial velocity is .3m/s. I know this because on the velocity versus time graph in the y direction, the b in the equation of the line is .3m/s.The velocity at the top of its x path is .6m/s.
f. The velocity at the top of its path in the y direction is 0m/s. I can distinguish this by looking at my v versus t graph in the y direction. By looking to find a straight diagonal on the graph, I can see that the line cuts through the y value of 0. This represents the point where the ball hits the vertex at 0m/s.
The final velocity in the x direction is 2.94 m/s. This can be found be looking at the equation on the graph and identifying the number plugged in for b in y=mx+b. The final velocity in the y direction is -2.06 m/s. The ball traveled 1.13m total in the y direction. The ball traveled .71 meters. How much time did it take for the ball to get to the top of the path? It took the ball 4.04 seconds to get to the top of the path.The ball was in the air for 4.348 seconds.
4. Conclusions
This project introduced a new perspective into thinking about force for our class. I split forces into vertical and horizontal directions. The vertical direction in this project incorporated the CAPM and UFPM model. The vertical direction used the following equations: (Keep in mind that any of these equations could solve for any of the variables used in them. Algebraically you could solve for whatever variable you didn't know by plugging in the known factors.)
Vf=at+Vi (equation for final velocity)
x=1/2(a)(t^2)+Vit (equation for displacement)
Vf^2=Vi^2+2a (equation for final velocity)
In the horizontal direction, there is no acceleration. Since there is constant velocity and no acceleration the following equation can be easily used. The horizontal direction applied the BFPM and CVPM models.
The vertical forces could be found using the following equations:
V= change in X
change in t
Monday, February 15, 2016
UFPM: Nikki and Elise
Materials:
-cart
-buggy
-pulley
-Atwood machine
-500 kg weight
First we took the mass in grams of all variables in
the experiment, and converted them to Newtons.
In this experiment, the goal was to predict the
point that the buggy and the pulley would intersect. To make this prediction,
we had to find the following variables:
•
net force
•
velocity of the buggy
mass and net force on the Atwood Machine
In this experiment, we did not take the acceleration of the
buggy became the force was balanced since it moved at constant velocity.
Item
|
Mass (kg)
|
Buggy
|
.477
|
Cart
|
.9892
|
Pulley
|
.0509
|
Total system
|
1.04
|
First, we plugged in Fg, which was -10.04N, and could conclude that the
diagram was balanced in the vertical direction, so therefore Fn was also 10.4N.
We knew that it was frictionless along the surface, so we concluded
friction was 0N. Next, to solve for Ft, we used the equation: Fnet= -Ff+ Ft
(which is equal to ma).
Using the data we found for the mass of the pulley, we found the force
of this mass due to gravity.
.0509 kg
Fg2= 0.509N
After I found the Fnet in the horizontal direction, I plugged it and the
mass into A=Fnet.
Then I used the equation for displacement to solve for time of the
hanging mass to drop.
ΔX= 1/2at^2+Vit
.86 = 1/2at^2 + Vit
(2) .86 = .5 t^2
1.8547 = t
Prediction:
1.85s =t
I also timed how long it would go for the buggy to
go one meter. Since it is moving at constant
speed, acceleration is equal to 0. So the equation becomes:
ΔX= Vit
Vi= ΔX = 1 m= 0.25 m/s
T 4
Now that we found the velocity, we can use the time
it took for the hanging mass to drop and solve for the displacement of the
buggy.
Δx= Vit
(.25)(1.85)
ΔX= .4625m
=46.25cm back from where the pulley will land.
Our pulley landed on the cart, so the experiment
had 0% error.
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Fan Cart Blog
Group A: Nikki and Elise
Group D: Hudson and Maren
Purpose: The purpose of the lab was to find the point of intersection between two cars from different groups. The cars accelerated from rest from different starting points, and using our data we predicted the point where they would collide.
Materials: Chalk, 2 Fan carts, timer, meter stick
Lab Description: Our group lost our work but however, received our original information from Group D (who had the opposing cart whose collision we predicted). Using this data we calculated our prediction for collision point.
Group D: Hudson and Maren
Purpose: The purpose of the lab was to find the point of intersection between two cars from different groups. The cars accelerated from rest from different starting points, and using our data we predicted the point where they would collide.
Materials: Chalk, 2 Fan carts, timer, meter stick
Lab Description: Our group lost our work but however, received our original information from Group D (who had the opposing cart whose collision we predicted). Using this data we calculated our prediction for collision point.
Group D- Initial velocity was Vi:-.18
Starting point: 1m away from motion sensor
Group D then plugged these values in the equation:
∆x=1/2a(∆t)^2+(-.18)(t)
The found the value 4.3 seconds.
Our group found our initial velocity and plugged it into the same equation.
This equation produced: ∆x=1/2(.1203)^2+(.18)(t)
After testing our estimates to find the point of intersection, we found these values.
We predicted:
Cart C: 97cm
Cart D: 1.072m
Percent error: 0%
The results showed an intersection at exactly our predicted distance, therefore our group had zero percent error.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)